ghsa-cvxm-8hgf-6m6m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:24
Modified
2024-06-04 18:30
Severity ?
Details
scp in OpenSSH through 8.3p1 allows command injection in scp.c remote function, as demonstrated by backtick characters in the destination argument. NOTE: the vendor reportedly has stated that they intentionally omit validation of "anomalous argument transfers" because that could "stand a great chance of breaking existing workflows."
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2020-15778", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-78", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2020-07-24T14:15:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "scp in OpenSSH through 8.3p1 allows command injection in scp.c remote function, as demonstrated by backtick characters in the destination argument. NOTE: the vendor reportedly has stated that they intentionally omit validation of \"anomalous argument transfers\" because that could \"stand a great chance of breaking existing workflows.\"", id: "GHSA-cvxm-8hgf-6m6m", modified: "2024-06-04T18:30:41Z", published: "2022-05-24T17:24:18Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15778", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3166", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/cpandya2909/CVE-2020-15778", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25005567", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202212-06", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200731-0007", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.openssh.com/security.html", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.