ghsa-cv2p-mqwj-vfxc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-05-17 12:31
Modified
2024-06-27 15:30
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

efi/capsule-loader: fix incorrect allocation size

gcc-14 notices that the allocation with sizeof(void) on 32-bit architectures is not enough for a 64-bit phys_addr_t:

drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c: In function 'efi_capsule_open': drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c:295:24: error: allocation of insufficient size '4' for type 'phys_addr_t' {aka 'long long unsigned int'} with size '8' [-Werror=alloc-size] 295 | cap_info->phys = kzalloc(sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL); | ^

Use the correct type instead here.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2024-27413",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2024-05-17T12:15:12Z",
      severity: null,
   },
   details: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nefi/capsule-loader: fix incorrect allocation size\n\ngcc-14 notices that the allocation with sizeof(void) on 32-bit architectures\nis not enough for a 64-bit phys_addr_t:\n\ndrivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c: In function 'efi_capsule_open':\ndrivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c:295:24: error: allocation of insufficient size '4' for type 'phys_addr_t' {aka 'long long unsigned int'} with size '8' [-Werror=alloc-size]\n  295 |         cap_info->phys = kzalloc(sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);\n      |                        ^\n\nUse the correct type instead here.",
   id: "GHSA-cv2p-mqwj-vfxc",
   modified: "2024-06-27T15:30:39Z",
   published: "2024-05-17T12:31:00Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27413",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/00cf21ac526011a29fc708f8912da446fac19f7b",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/11aabd7487857b8e7d768fefb092f66dfde68492",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b73473c050a612fb4317831371073eda07c3050",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/537e3f49dbe88881a6f0752beaa596942d9efd64",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62a5dcd9bd3097e9813de62fa6f22815e84a0172",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/950d4d74d311a18baed6878dbfba8180d7e5dddd",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddc547dd05a46720866c32022300f7376c40119f",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fccfa646ef3628097d59f7d9c1a3e84d4b6bb45e",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00017.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.