ghsa-cr76-625x-q34w
Vulnerability from github
7.1 (High) - CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L
An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved on ACX7000 Series allows an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a
Denial-of-Service (DoS).
On all ACX 7000 Series platforms running
Junos OS Evolved, and configured with IRBs, if a Customer Edge device (CE) device is dual homed to two Provider Edge devices (PE) a traffic loop will occur when the CE sends multicast packets. This issue can be triggered by IPv4 and IPv6 traffic.
This issue affects Junos OS Evolved:
All versions from 22.2R1-EVO and later versions before 22.4R2-EVO,
This issue does not affect Junos OS Evolved versions before 22.1R1-EVO.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2024-39519", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-754", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2024-07-11T16:15:02Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved on ACX7000 Series allows an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a \n\nDenial-of-Service (DoS).\n\nOn all ACX 7000 Series platforms running \n\nJunos OS Evolved, and configured with IRBs, if a Customer Edge device (CE) device is dual homed to two Provider Edge devices (PE) a traffic loop will occur when the CE sends multicast packets. This issue can be triggered by IPv4 and IPv6 traffic.\n\n\nThis issue affects Junos OS Evolved: \n\nAll versions from 22.2R1-EVO and later versions before 22.4R2-EVO,\n\nThis issue does not affect Junos OS Evolved versions before 22.1R1-EVO.", id: "GHSA-cr76-625x-q34w", modified: "2024-09-23T15:30:59Z", published: "2024-07-11T18:31:12Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39519", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA82983", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, { score: "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X", type: "CVSS_V4", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.