ghsa-cqwh-fpfr-9p4j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-05-20 12:30
Modified
2024-06-26 00:31
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
riscv: Fix TASK_SIZE on 64-bit NOMMU
On NOMMU, userspace memory can come from anywhere in physical RAM. The current definition of TASK_SIZE is wrong if any RAM exists above 4G, causing spurious failures in the userspace access routines.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2024-35988", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2024-05-20T10:15:13Z", severity: null, }, details: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nriscv: Fix TASK_SIZE on 64-bit NOMMU\n\nOn NOMMU, userspace memory can come from anywhere in physical RAM. The\ncurrent definition of TASK_SIZE is wrong if any RAM exists above 4G,\ncausing spurious failures in the userspace access routines.", id: "GHSA-cqwh-fpfr-9p4j", modified: "2024-06-26T00:31:43Z", published: "2024-05-20T12:30:29Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35988", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/04bf2e5f95c1a52e28a7567a507f926efe31c3b6", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4201b8c8f2c32af321fb50867e68ac6c1cbed4be", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52e8a42b11078d2aad4b9ba96503d77c7299168b", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6065e736f82c817c9a597a31ee67f0ce4628e948", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a0f0dbbb1bc49fa0de18e92c36492ff6d804cdaa", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/efdcfa554b6eb228943ef1dd4d023c606be647d2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00017.html", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.