ghsa-cqq9-qgwr-48j4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:07
Modified
2022-05-03 03:07
Details
Buffer overflow in University of Washington imap server (uw-imapd) imap-2001 (imapd 2001.315) and imap-2001a (imapd 2001.315) with legacy RFC 1730 support, and imapd 2000.287 and earlier, allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a long BODY request.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2002-0379" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2002-06-25T04:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in University of Washington imap server (uw-imapd) imap-2001 (imapd 2001.315) and imap-2001a (imapd 2001.315) with legacy RFC 1730 support, and imapd 2000.287 and earlier, allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a long BODY request.", "id": "GHSA-cqq9-qgwr-48j4", "modified": "2022-05-03T03:07:51Z", "published": "2022-05-03T03:07:51Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-0379" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/10803" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://distro.conectiva.com/atualizacoes/?id=a\u0026anuncio=000487" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=102107222100529\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://online.securityfocus.com/advisories/4167" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/9055.php" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/961489" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/security/2002/MDKSA-2002-034.php" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.linuxsecurity.com/advisories/other_advisory-2120.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2002-092.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/4713" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.washington.edu/imap/buffer.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.