ghsa-ch98-87fr-x9f7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-11-19 03:31
Modified
2024-11-27 18:34
Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
filemap: Fix bounds checking in filemap_read()
If the caller supplies an iocb->ki_pos value that is close to the filesystem upper limit, and an iterator with a count that causes us to overflow that limit, then filemap_read() enters an infinite loop.
This behaviour was discovered when testing xfstests generic/525 with the "localio" optimisation for loopback NFS mounts.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2024-50272", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-835", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2024-11-19T02:16:29Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfilemap: Fix bounds checking in filemap_read()\n\nIf the caller supplies an iocb->ki_pos value that is close to the\nfilesystem upper limit, and an iterator with a count that causes us to\noverflow that limit, then filemap_read() enters an infinite loop.\n\nThis behaviour was discovered when testing xfstests generic/525 with the\n\"localio\" optimisation for loopback NFS mounts.", id: "GHSA-ch98-87fr-x9f7", modified: "2024-11-27T18:34:00Z", published: "2024-11-19T03:31:07Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50272", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/26530b757c81f1389fb33ae0357500150933161b", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6450e73f4c86d481ac2e22e1bc848d346e140826", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2746ab3bbc9c6408da5cd072653ec8c24749235", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ace149e0830c380ddfce7e466fe860ca502fe4ee", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.