GHSA-CH3G-4XVR-674Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-22 19:48 – Updated: 2026-09-22 19:48
VLAI
Summary
OpenCVE: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in notifications
Details

Impact

OpenCVE contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the notification testing functionality for both Webhook and Slack integrations.

An authenticated user with permission to configure notification channels can trigger test requests to arbitrary HTTP(S) endpoints. Insufficient validation of target destinations allows requests to be sent to hosts reachable from the OpenCVE server, including internal network resources, localhost interfaces, and cloud metadata services.

Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to interact with internal services that are not otherwise accessible from the Internet and retrieve information from HTTP-based services reachable by the OpenCVE instance.

Patches

The vulnerability has been fixed in OpenCVE version 3.0.0, users should upgrade to version 3.0.0 or later.

The fix introduces additional validation of user-supplied URLs used by the notification testing functionality and prevents requests to localhost, private network ranges, link-local addresses, cloud metadata services, and other non-public destinations.

Workarounds

Users unable to upgrade should restrict outbound network access from OpenCVE to trusted external destinations using firewall rules, network policies, or egress filtering.

Where possible, access to localhost interfaces, private network ranges, and cloud metadata services should be blocked from the OpenCVE application environment.

Disabling access to the notification testing functionality also mitigates the issue.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.5.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "opencve"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.0.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-62282"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-22T19:48:05Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-18T14:17:19Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nOpenCVE contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the notification testing functionality for both Webhook and Slack integrations.\n\nAn authenticated user with permission to configure notification channels can trigger test requests to arbitrary HTTP(S) endpoints. Insufficient validation of target destinations allows requests to be sent to hosts reachable from the OpenCVE server, including internal network resources, localhost interfaces, and cloud metadata services.\n\nSuccessful exploitation could allow an attacker to interact with internal services that are not otherwise accessible from the Internet and retrieve information from HTTP-based services reachable by the OpenCVE instance.\n\n### Patches\n\nThe vulnerability has been fixed in OpenCVE version 3.0.0,  users should upgrade to version 3.0.0 or later.\n\nThe fix introduces additional validation of user-supplied URLs used by the notification testing functionality and prevents requests to localhost, private network ranges, link-local addresses, cloud metadata services, and other non-public destinations.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nUsers unable to upgrade should restrict outbound network access from OpenCVE to trusted external destinations using firewall rules, network policies, or egress filtering.\n\nWhere possible, access to localhost interfaces, private network ranges, and cloud metadata services should be blocked from the OpenCVE application environment.\n\nDisabling access to the notification testing functionality also mitigates the issue.",
  "id": "GHSA-ch3g-4xvr-674q",
  "modified": "2026-09-22T19:48:06Z",
  "published": "2026-09-22T19:48:05Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/opencve/opencve/security/advisories/GHSA-ch3g-4xvr-674q"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-62282"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/opencve/opencve/issues/743"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/opencve/opencve/pull/747"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/opencve/opencve/commit/0af7f894debc95c67fa53e7ba5a6cdecb10c34f0"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/opencve/opencve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/opencve/opencve/releases/tag/v3.0.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "OpenCVE: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in notifications"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…