GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-CGHM-V6V8-JP7R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-28 15:30 – Updated: 2025-10-29 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fsdax: Fix infinite loop in dax_iomap_rw()

I got an infinite loop and a WARNING report when executing a tail command in virtiofs.

WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 964 at fs/iomap/iter.c:34 iomap_iter+0x3a2/0x3d0 Modules linked in: CPU: 10 PID: 964 Comm: tail Not tainted 5.19.0-rc7 Call Trace: dax_iomap_rw+0xea/0x620 ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20 fuse_dax_read_iter+0x47/0x80 fuse_file_read_iter+0xae/0xd0 new_sync_read+0xfe/0x180 ? 0xffffffff81000000 vfs_read+0x14d/0x1a0 ksys_read+0x6d/0xf0 __x64_sys_read+0x1a/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

The tail command will call read() with a count of 0. In this case, iomap_iter() will report this WARNING, and always return 1 which casuing the infinite loop in dax_iomap_rw().

Fixing by checking count whether is 0 in dax_iomap_rw().

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-48635"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-835"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-28T13:15:06Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfsdax: Fix infinite loop in dax_iomap_rw()\n\nI got an infinite loop and a WARNING report when executing a tail command\nin virtiofs.\n\n  WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 964 at fs/iomap/iter.c:34 iomap_iter+0x3a2/0x3d0\n  Modules linked in:\n  CPU: 10 PID: 964 Comm: tail Not tainted 5.19.0-rc7\n  Call Trace:\n  \u003cTASK\u003e\n  dax_iomap_rw+0xea/0x620\n  ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20\n  fuse_dax_read_iter+0x47/0x80\n  fuse_file_read_iter+0xae/0xd0\n  new_sync_read+0xfe/0x180\n  ? 0xffffffff81000000\n  vfs_read+0x14d/0x1a0\n  ksys_read+0x6d/0xf0\n  __x64_sys_read+0x1a/0x20\n  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90\n  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\n\nThe tail command will call read() with a count of 0. In this case,\niomap_iter() will report this WARNING, and always return 1 which casuing\nthe infinite loop in dax_iomap_rw().\n\nFixing by checking count whether is 0 in dax_iomap_rw().",
  "id": "GHSA-cghm-v6v8-jp7r",
  "modified": "2025-10-29T15:31:50Z",
  "published": "2024-04-28T15:30:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48635"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/17d9c15c9b9e7fb285f7ac5367dfb5f00ff575e3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/463f36137c40342fb03bba380c1bf703c40d89a6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/60644dffac87b1bb47bdb393aa29d5f2ffcf41a0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/929ef155e1da41c06f4d8ca86ae12b851a83a744"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…