GHSA-CF96-W592-HC5W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-17 15:31 – Updated: 2025-09-19 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: zoned: fix lock ordering in btrfs_zone_activate()

The btrfs CI reported a lockdep warning as follows by running generic generic/129.

WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc5+ #1 Not tainted


kworker/u5:5/793427 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88813256d028 (&cache->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_zone_finish_one_bg+0x5e/0x130 but task is already holding lock: ffff88810a23a318 (&fs_info->zone_active_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_zone_finish_one_bg+0x34/0x130 which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&fs_info->zone_active_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}: ... -> #0 (&cache->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}: ...

This is because we take fs_info->zone_active_bgs_lock after a block_group's lock in btrfs_zone_activate() while doing the opposite in other places.

Fix the issue by expanding the fs_info->zone_active_bgs_lock's critical section and taking it before a block_group's lock.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-52668"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-667"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-17T14:15:09Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: zoned: fix lock ordering in btrfs_zone_activate()\n\nThe btrfs CI reported a lockdep warning as follows by running generic\ngeneric/129.\n\n   WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n   6.7.0-rc5+ #1 Not tainted\n   ------------------------------------------------------\n   kworker/u5:5/793427 is trying to acquire lock:\n   ffff88813256d028 (\u0026cache-\u003elock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_zone_finish_one_bg+0x5e/0x130\n   but task is already holding lock:\n   ffff88810a23a318 (\u0026fs_info-\u003ezone_active_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_zone_finish_one_bg+0x34/0x130\n   which lock already depends on the new lock.\n\n   the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n   -\u003e #1 (\u0026fs_info-\u003ezone_active_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}:\n   ...\n   -\u003e #0 (\u0026cache-\u003elock){+.+.}-{2:2}:\n   ...\n\nThis is because we take fs_info-\u003ezone_active_bgs_lock after a block_group\u0027s\nlock in btrfs_zone_activate() while doing the opposite in other places.\n\nFix the issue by expanding the fs_info-\u003ezone_active_bgs_lock\u0027s critical\nsection and taking it before a block_group\u0027s lock.",
  "id": "GHSA-cf96-w592-hc5w",
  "modified": "2025-09-19T15:31:07Z",
  "published": "2024-05-17T15:31:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52668"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1908e9d01e5395adff68d9d308a0fb15337e6272"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f74989f5909cdec9b1274641f0fa306b15bb476"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b18f3b60b35a8c01c9a2a0f0d6424c6d73971dc3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…