ghsa-c987-4q4r-p52g
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-11-26 06:31
Modified
2024-11-26 06:31
Severity ?
Details
The Security & Malware scan by CleanTalk plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized SQL Injection due to an authorization bypass via reverse DNS spoofing on the checkWithoutToken function in all versions up to, and including, 2.145, as well as insufficient input sanitization and validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-10570" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-89" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-26T06:15:07Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The Security \u0026 Malware scan by CleanTalk plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized SQL Injection due to an authorization bypass via reverse DNS spoofing on the checkWithoutToken function in all versions up to, and including, 2.145, as well as insufficient input sanitization and validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database.", "id": "GHSA-c987-4q4r-p52g", "modified": "2024-11-26T06:31:03Z", "published": "2024-11-26T06:31:03Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-10570" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/security-malware-firewall/tags/2.145/lib/CleantalkSP/Common/RemoteCalls.php#L59" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/2187311d-6651-4eca-806d-aa2ff9fae4e2?source=cve" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.