ghsa-9mrj-wq9r-h4vw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:42
Modified
2022-05-24 17:42
Details
An issue was discovered in Sangoma Asterisk 16.x before 16.16.1, 17.x before 17.9.2, and 18.x before 18.2.1 and Certified Asterisk before 16.8-cert6. When re-negotiating for T.38, if the initial remote response was delayed just enough, Asterisk would send both audio and T.38 in the SDP. If this happened, and the remote responded with a declined T.38 stream, then Asterisk would crash.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-26717" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2021-02-18T20:15:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "An issue was discovered in Sangoma Asterisk 16.x before 16.16.1, 17.x before 17.9.2, and 18.x before 18.2.1 and Certified Asterisk before 16.8-cert6. When re-negotiating for T.38, if the initial remote response was delayed just enough, Asterisk would send both audio and T.38 in the SDP. If this happened, and the remote responded with a declined T.38 stream, then Asterisk would crash.", "id": "GHSA-9mrj-wq9r-h4vw", "modified": "2022-05-24T17:42:37Z", "published": "2022-05-24T17:42:37Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26717" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2021-002.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-29203" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/161471/Asterisk-Project-Security-Advisory-AST-2021-002.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Feb/58" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.