ghsa-9m49-mcgc-vjxx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:11
Modified
2022-05-13 01:11
Details

A stack-based buffer overflow was discovered in the pgxtoimage function in bin/jp2/convert.c in OpenJPEG 2.2.0. The vulnerability causes an out-of-bounds write, which may lead to remote denial of service or possibly remote code execution.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-14041"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-08-30T22:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A stack-based buffer overflow was discovered in the pgxtoimage function in bin/jp2/convert.c in OpenJPEG 2.2.0. The vulnerability causes an out-of-bounds write, which may lead to remote denial of service or possibly remote code execution.",
  "id": "GHSA-9m49-mcgc-vjxx",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:11:49Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:11:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-14041"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/997"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/commit/e5285319229a5d77bf316bb0d3a6cbd3cb8666d9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2017/08/28/openjpeg-stack-based-buffer-overflow-write-in-pgxtoimage-convert-c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4013"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100555"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.