ghsa-9g26-m4cr-3gm2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 00:36
Modified
2022-05-17 00:36
Details

Buffer overflow in the IMAP service in NetWin Surgemail 3.9e, and possibly other versions before 3.9g2, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long first argument to the APPEND command, a different vector than CVE-2008-1497 and CVE-2008-1498. NOTE: due to lack of details, it is not certain whether this is the same issue as CVE-2008-2859.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2008-7182"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2009-09-08T10:30:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in the IMAP service in NetWin Surgemail 3.9e, and possibly other versions before 3.9g2, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long first argument to the APPEND command, a different vector than CVE-2008-1497 and CVE-2008-1498.  NOTE: due to lack of details, it is not certain whether this is the same issue as CVE-2008-2859.",
  "id": "GHSA-9g26-m4cr-3gm2",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T00:36:22Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T00:36:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-7182"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/5968"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.netwinsite.com/surgemail/help/updates.htm"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/496482"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30000"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.