GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-9CFQ-2RJH-R5VR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-04 18:31 – Updated: 2026-09-04 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

vxlan: keep the last remote linked during FDB flush

A non-nexthop FDB entry is expected to have at least one remote while it remains reachable through the FDB hash table. A filtered bulk flush violates this invariant when every remote matches: It unlinks the last remote in vxlan_fdb_dst_destroy() and only afterwards tells vxlan_flush() to destroy the parent FDB entry.

An RCU reader can find the parent during this interval. first_remote_rcu() then applies list_entry_rcu() to the empty list head, producing an invalid remote pointer that the receive learning path can read from and write to.

When a matching remote is the sole remaining remote, leave it linked and ask the caller to destroy the entire FDB entry. vxlan_fdb_destroy() keeps the remote attached while sending the deletion notification and removing the parent from the lookup structures.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-80838"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-04T16:18:12Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nvxlan: keep the last remote linked during FDB flush\n\nA non-nexthop FDB entry is expected to have at least one remote while it\nremains reachable through the FDB hash table. A filtered bulk flush\nviolates this invariant when every remote matches: It unlinks the last\nremote in vxlan_fdb_dst_destroy() and only afterwards tells vxlan_flush()\nto destroy the parent FDB entry.\n\nAn RCU reader can find the parent during this interval.\nfirst_remote_rcu() then applies list_entry_rcu() to the empty list head,\nproducing an invalid remote pointer that the receive learning path can\nread from and write to.\n\nWhen a matching remote is the sole remaining remote, leave it linked and\nask the caller to destroy the entire FDB entry. vxlan_fdb_destroy() keeps\nthe remote attached while sending the deletion notification and removing\nthe parent from the lookup structures.",
  "id": "GHSA-9cfq-2rjh-r5vr",
  "modified": "2026-09-04T18:31:28Z",
  "published": "2026-09-04T18:31:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80838"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2a7c2f00843225d5f037676bca649321f3d024c7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4bbc76ee1b21d3bd045d6d819b2bacd30a6372ab"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ba68fd6cdd1e3c92b92f25c7e48bf7bd51a183c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a8820c8a7718327e96849782033e7c85a0f6bcfe"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d5d4a7b538b52db63927773a8905fcd9f78a42e2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…