ghsa-8r4r-8c3p-6r95
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-10-21 18:30
Modified
2024-11-20 18:32
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tracing/timerlat: Fix a race during cpuhp processing

There is another found exception that the "timerlat/1" thread was scheduled on CPU0, and lead to timer corruption finally:

ODEBUG: init active (active state 0) object: ffff888237c2e108 object type: hrtimer hint: timerlat_irq+0x0/0x220 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 426 at lib/debugobjects.c:518 debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 426 Comm: timerlat/1 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc7+ #45 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ... Call Trace: <TASK> ? __warn+0x7c/0x110 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ? report_bug+0xf1/0x1d0 ? prb_read_valid+0x17/0x20 ? handle_bug+0x3f/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ? __pfx_timerlat_irq+0x10/0x10 __debug_object_init+0x110/0x150 hrtimer_init+0x1d/0x60 timerlat_main+0xab/0x2d0 ? __pfx_timerlat_main+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xb7/0xe0 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>

After tracing the scheduling event, it was discovered that the migration of the "timerlat/1" thread was performed during thread creation. Further analysis confirmed that it is because the CPU online processing for osnoise is implemented through workers, which is asynchronous with the offline processing. When the worker was scheduled to create a thread, the CPU may has already been removed from the cpu_online_mask during the offline process, resulting in the inability to select the right CPU:

T1 | T2 [CPUHP_ONLINE] | cpu_device_down() osnoise_hotplug_workfn() | | cpus_write_lock() | takedown_cpu(1) | cpus_write_unlock() [CPUHP_OFFLINE] | cpus_read_lock() | start_kthread(1) | cpus_read_unlock() |

To fix this, skip online processing if the CPU is already offline.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-49866"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-362"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-10-21T18:15:06Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ntracing/timerlat: Fix a race during cpuhp processing\n\nThere is another found exception that the \"timerlat/1\" thread was\nscheduled on CPU0, and lead to timer corruption finally:\n\n```\nODEBUG: init active (active state 0) object: ffff888237c2e108 object type: hrtimer hint: timerlat_irq+0x0/0x220\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 426 at lib/debugobjects.c:518 debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 426 Comm: timerlat/1 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc7+ #45\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0\n...\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n ? __warn+0x7c/0x110\n ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0\n ? report_bug+0xf1/0x1d0\n ? prb_read_valid+0x17/0x20\n ? handle_bug+0x3f/0x70\n ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20\n ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0\n ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0\n ? __pfx_timerlat_irq+0x10/0x10\n __debug_object_init+0x110/0x150\n hrtimer_init+0x1d/0x60\n timerlat_main+0xab/0x2d0\n ? __pfx_timerlat_main+0x10/0x10\n kthread+0xb7/0xe0\n ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x40\n ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n```\n\nAfter tracing the scheduling event, it was discovered that the migration\nof the \"timerlat/1\" thread was performed during thread creation. Further\nanalysis confirmed that it is because the CPU online processing for\nosnoise is implemented through workers, which is asynchronous with the\noffline processing. When the worker was scheduled to create a thread, the\nCPU may has already been removed from the cpu_online_mask during the offline\nprocess, resulting in the inability to select the right CPU:\n\nT1                       | T2\n[CPUHP_ONLINE]           | cpu_device_down()\nosnoise_hotplug_workfn() |\n                         |     cpus_write_lock()\n                         |     takedown_cpu(1)\n                         |     cpus_write_unlock()\n[CPUHP_OFFLINE]          |\n    cpus_read_lock()     |\n    start_kthread(1)     |\n    cpus_read_unlock()   |\n\nTo fix this, skip online processing if the CPU is already offline.",
  "id": "GHSA-8r4r-8c3p-6r95",
  "modified": "2024-11-20T18:32:15Z",
  "published": "2024-10-21T18:30:56Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49866"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/322920b53dc11f9c2b33397eb3ae5bc6a175b60d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/829e0c9f0855f26b3ae830d17b24aec103f7e915"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a0d9c0cd5856191e095cf43a2e141b73945b7716"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a6e9849063a6c8f4cb2f652a437e44e3ed24356c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce25f33ba89d6eefef64157655d318444580fa14"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f72b451dc75578f644a3019c1489e9ae2c14e6c4"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.