GHSA-8M6J-C7JR-PC5F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-08-29 20:06 – Updated: 2022-09-08 00:00
VLAI?
Details
A vulnerability was found in fapolicyd. The vulnerability occurs due to an assumption on how glibc names the runtime linker, a build time regular expression may not correctly detect the runtime linker. The consequence is that the pattern detection for applications launched by the run time linker may fail to detect the pattern and allow execution.
Severity ?
8.4 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-1117"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-552"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-08-29T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was found in fapolicyd. The vulnerability occurs due to an assumption on how glibc names the runtime linker, a build time regular expression may not correctly detect the runtime linker. The consequence is that the pattern detection for applications launched by the run time linker may fail to detect the pattern and allow execution.",
"id": "GHSA-8m6j-c7jr-pc5f",
"modified": "2022-09-08T00:00:33Z",
"published": "2022-08-29T20:06:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1117"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/linux-application-whitelisting/fapolicyd/commit/38a942613f93824c53164730b2b7a2f75b8cd263"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:1898"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:4824"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1117"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066904"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068171"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…