ghsa-8h6v-vg4c-567j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 02:10
Modified
2022-05-01 02:10
Details
Behavioral discrepancy information leak in Juniper Netscreen VPN running ScreenOS 5.2.0 and earlier, when using IKE with pre-shared key authentication, allows remote attackers to enumerate valid usernames via an IKE Aggressive Mode packet, which generates a response if the username is valid but does not respond when the username is invalid.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2005-2640" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2005-08-23T04:00:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Behavioral discrepancy information leak in Juniper Netscreen VPN running ScreenOS 5.2.0 and earlier, when using IKE with pre-shared key authentication, allows remote attackers to enumerate valid usernames via an IKE Aggressive Mode packet, which generates a response if the username is valid but does not respond when the username is invalid.", "id": "GHSA-8h6v-vg4c-567j", "modified": "2022-05-01T02:10:21Z", "published": "2022-05-01T02:10:21Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2640" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=112438068426034\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/16474" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1014728" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.nta-monitor.com/news/vpn-flaws/juniper/netscreen/index.htm" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14595" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.