ghsa-8g33-q77c-23f6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:06
Modified
2022-05-14 02:06
Details
The asn1_get_sequence_of function in library/asn1parse.c in PolarSSL 1.0 through 1.2.12 and 1.3.x through 1.3.9 does not properly initialize a pointer in the asn1_sequence linked list, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted ASN.1 sequence in a certificate.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-1182" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-01-27T20:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The asn1_get_sequence_of function in library/asn1parse.c in PolarSSL 1.0 through 1.2.12 and 1.3.x through 1.3.9 does not properly initialize a pointer in the asn1_sequence linked list, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted ASN.1 sequence in a certificate.", "id": "GHSA-8g33-q77c-23f6", "modified": "2022-05-14T02:06:32Z", "published": "2022-05-14T02:06:32Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-1182" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://polarssl.org/tech-updates/security-advisories/polarssl-security-advisory-2014-04" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201801-15" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/148829.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/148903.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-02/msg00003.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/62270" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/62610" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3136" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.