GHSA-7WRV-94GW-59PJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-19 18:31 – Updated: 2026-07-20 15:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

idpf: fix read_dev_clk_lock spinlock init in idpf_ptp_init()

In idpf_ptp_init(), read_dev_clk_lock is initialized after ptp_schedule_worker() had already been called (and after idpf_ptp_settime64() could reach the lock). The PTP aux worker fires immediately upon scheduling and can call into idpf_ptp_read_src_clk_reg_direct(), which takes spin_lock(&ptp->read_dev_clk_lock) on an uninitialized lock, triggering the lockdep "non-static key" warning:

[12973.796587] idpf 0000:83:00.0: Device HW Reset initiated [12974.094507] INFO: trying to register non-static key. ... [12974.097208] Call Trace: [12974.097213] [12974.097218] dump_stack_lvl+0x93/0xe0 [12974.097234] register_lock_class+0x4c4/0x4e0 [12974.097249] ? __lock_acquire+0x427/0x2290 [12974.097259] __lock_acquire+0x98/0x2290 [12974.097272] lock_acquire+0xc6/0x310 [12974.097281] ? idpf_ptp_read_src_clk_reg+0xb7/0x150 [idpf] [12974.097311] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xde/0x190 [12974.097318] ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xd2/0x350 [12974.097330] ? __pfx_ptp_aux_kworker+0x10/0x10 [ptp] [12974.097343] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40 [12974.097353] ? idpf_ptp_read_src_clk_reg+0xb7/0x150 [idpf] [12974.097373] idpf_ptp_read_src_clk_reg+0xb7/0x150 [idpf] [12974.097391] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x88/0x3d0 [12974.097404] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x4e/0x3d0 [12974.097411] idpf_ptp_update_cached_phctime+0x26/0x120 [idpf] [12974.097428] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x28/0x50 [12974.097436] idpf_ptp_do_aux_work+0x15/0x20 [idpf] [12974.097454] ptp_aux_kworker+0x20/0x40 [ptp] [12974.097464] kthread_worker_fn+0xd5/0x3d0 [12974.097474] ? __pfx_kthread_worker_fn+0x10/0x10 [12974.097482] kthread+0xf4/0x130 [12974.097489] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [12974.097498] ret_from_fork+0x32c/0x410 [12974.097512] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [12974.097519] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [12974.097540]

Move the call to spin_lock_init() up a bit to make sure read_dev_clk_lock is not touched before it's been initialized.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-64162"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-19T16:17:58Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nidpf: fix read_dev_clk_lock spinlock init in idpf_ptp_init()\n\nIn idpf_ptp_init(), read_dev_clk_lock is initialized after\nptp_schedule_worker() had already been called (and after\nidpf_ptp_settime64() could reach the lock). The PTP aux worker\nfires immediately upon scheduling and can call into\nidpf_ptp_read_src_clk_reg_direct(), which takes\nspin_lock(\u0026ptp-\u003eread_dev_clk_lock) on an uninitialized lock, triggering\nthe lockdep \"non-static key\" warning:\n\n[12973.796587] idpf 0000:83:00.0: Device HW Reset initiated\n[12974.094507] INFO: trying to register non-static key.\n...\n[12974.097208] Call Trace:\n[12974.097213]  \u003cTASK\u003e\n[12974.097218]  dump_stack_lvl+0x93/0xe0\n[12974.097234]  register_lock_class+0x4c4/0x4e0\n[12974.097249]  ? __lock_acquire+0x427/0x2290\n[12974.097259]  __lock_acquire+0x98/0x2290\n[12974.097272]  lock_acquire+0xc6/0x310\n[12974.097281]  ? idpf_ptp_read_src_clk_reg+0xb7/0x150 [idpf]\n[12974.097311]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xde/0x190\n[12974.097318]  ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xd2/0x350\n[12974.097330]  ? __pfx_ptp_aux_kworker+0x10/0x10 [ptp]\n[12974.097343]  _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40\n[12974.097353]  ? idpf_ptp_read_src_clk_reg+0xb7/0x150 [idpf]\n[12974.097373]  idpf_ptp_read_src_clk_reg+0xb7/0x150 [idpf]\n[12974.097391]  ? kthread_worker_fn+0x88/0x3d0\n[12974.097404]  ? kthread_worker_fn+0x4e/0x3d0\n[12974.097411]  idpf_ptp_update_cached_phctime+0x26/0x120 [idpf]\n[12974.097428]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x28/0x50\n[12974.097436]  idpf_ptp_do_aux_work+0x15/0x20 [idpf]\n[12974.097454]  ptp_aux_kworker+0x20/0x40 [ptp]\n[12974.097464]  kthread_worker_fn+0xd5/0x3d0\n[12974.097474]  ? __pfx_kthread_worker_fn+0x10/0x10\n[12974.097482]  kthread+0xf4/0x130\n[12974.097489]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n[12974.097498]  ret_from_fork+0x32c/0x410\n[12974.097512]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n[12974.097519]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n[12974.097540]  \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\nMove the call to spin_lock_init() up a bit to make sure read_dev_clk_lock\nis not touched before it\u0027s been initialized.",
  "id": "GHSA-7wrv-94gw-59pj",
  "modified": "2026-07-20T15:32:02Z",
  "published": "2026-07-19T18:31:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64162"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3122d70b7c0101d897fb795658a7b93f854935f2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/da4f76b6a84ede14a71282ef841768299ead0221"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb5991d4c8ba2e8153dfcda3e66a9608377b7dce"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…