ghsa-7rq3-6hvw-rrqj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:50
Modified
2022-05-02 03:50
Details
Buffer overflow in the ABWOutputDev::endWord function in poppler/ABWOutputDev.cc in Poppler (aka libpoppler) 0.10.6, 0.12.0, and possibly other versions, as used by the Abiword pdftoabw utility, allows user-assisted remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted PDF file.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2009-3938" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2009-11-13T16:30:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in the ABWOutputDev::endWord function in poppler/ABWOutputDev.cc in Poppler (aka libpoppler) 0.10.6, 0.12.0, and possibly other versions, as used by the Abiword pdftoabw utility, allows user-assisted remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted PDF file.", "id": "GHSA-7rq3-6hvw-rrqj", "modified": "2022-05-02T03:50:00Z", "published": "2022-05-02T03:50:00Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-3938" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/54215" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=534680" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=30599\u0026action=edit" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23074" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/37333" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1941" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:175" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36976" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3227" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.