GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-7PM4-4MCQ-P2R3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-04 18:31 – Updated: 2026-09-04 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

futex/pi: Plug private futex exec() race

The check for private futexes whether the waiter's mm, which is stored in the futex_key and copied into the pi_state, is the same as the owner's mm is not sufficient for exec(). exec() has a gap where the mm check fails to give the correct answer:

exec() ... exec_release_mm() futex_exec_release() tsk::futex::exit_state = EXITING; cleanup_robust_list(); 1) tsk::futex::exit_state = OK; ... old_mm = tsk::mm; 2) tsk::mm = ->mm;

Between #1 and #2 the check for the mm is wrong as that mm is about to be swapped out and eventually freed.

Plug this gap by:

1) Setting tsk::futex::exit_state to FUTEX_STATE_DEAD in futex_exec_release()

2) Setting tsk::futex::exit_state to FUTEX_STATE_OK after the mm has been switched.

From a futex point of view the task is dead after it finished the robust list cleanup up to the point where it sets the state to OK again.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-80777"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-04T16:18:03Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfutex/pi: Plug private futex exec() race\n\nThe check for private futexes whether the waiter\u0027s mm, which is stored in\nthe futex_key and copied into the pi_state, is the same as the owner\u0027s mm\nis not sufficient for exec(). exec() has a gap where the mm check fails to\ngive the correct answer:\n\n  exec()\n  ...\n    exec_release_mm()\n      futex_exec_release()\n        tsk::futex::exit_state = EXITING;\n        cleanup_robust_list();\n1)      tsk::futex::exit_state = OK;\n    ...\n    old_mm = tsk::mm;\n2)  tsk::mm = -\u003emm;\n\nBetween #1 and #2 the check for the mm is wrong as that mm is about to be\nswapped out and eventually freed.\n\nPlug this gap by:\n\n  1) Setting tsk::futex::exit_state to FUTEX_STATE_DEAD in\n     futex_exec_release()\n\n  2) Setting tsk::futex::exit_state to FUTEX_STATE_OK after\n     the mm has been switched.\n\nFrom a futex point of view the task is dead after it finished the robust\nlist cleanup up to the point where it sets the state to OK again.",
  "id": "GHSA-7pm4-4mcq-p2r3",
  "modified": "2026-09-04T18:31:25Z",
  "published": "2026-09-04T18:31:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80777"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0478bc6bf197629fea0331d65b39eeea043c6cf0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c5f0bc9fd1cec4a00400cc727fcde03e0fde17cc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d7944cee62ec6cca1c90780a766960a57d3b4bb8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fdf538b2e69653ff740e84042245018e5680cd7b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…