GHSA-7P9J-GMGX-G4FV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Tighten cgroup storage cookie checks for prog arrays

The fix in commit abad3d0bad72 ("bpf: Fix oob access in cgroup local storage") is still incomplete. The prog-array compatibility check treats a program with no cgroup storage as compatible with any stored storage cookie. This allows a storage-less program to bridge a tail call chain between an entry program and a storage-using callee even though cgroup local storage at runtime still follows the caller's context, that is, A -> B(no storage) -> C(storage) path.

Requiring exact cookie equality would break the legitimate case of a storage-less leaf program being tail called from a storage-using one. Instead, only accept a zero storage cookie if the program cannot perform tail calls itself. This keeps A -> B(no storage) working while rejecting the A -> B(no storage) -> C(storage) bridge.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-74305"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:30Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Tighten cgroup storage cookie checks for prog arrays\n\nThe fix in commit abad3d0bad72 (\"bpf: Fix oob access in cgroup local\nstorage\") is still incomplete. The prog-array compatibility check\ntreats a program with no cgroup storage as compatible with any stored\nstorage cookie. This allows a storage-less program to bridge a tail\ncall chain between an entry program and a storage-using callee even\nthough cgroup local storage at runtime still follows the caller\u0027s\ncontext, that is, A -\u003e B(no storage) -\u003e C(storage) path.\n\nRequiring exact cookie equality would break the legitimate case of a\nstorage-less leaf program being tail called from a storage-using one.\nInstead, only accept a zero storage cookie if the program cannot\nperform tail calls itself. This keeps A -\u003e B(no storage) working\nwhile rejecting the A -\u003e B(no storage) -\u003e C(storage) bridge.",
  "id": "GHSA-7p9j-gmgx-g4fv",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:37Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-74305"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10627ddc0167aab5c1c390a10ef461e9937aba08"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c762d28698483ce7c372091f34d86e4d4828652"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/46fbafe3d2d569d828e8d24a7dbe1659f63685cf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87177497cca90bf4fcfb759eb898560eb5b46a10"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9ca06849c4239aa2d580c54651f8588c51cb398b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cb22dc79528eb26a46d346c3118dbd6b14c70609"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb73056ce2a6f101ddd3bdba89af6b24ebffff85"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…