GHSA-7J4Q-9MX8-7779

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-07-27 06:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

Input: synaptics-rmi4 - bound the F30 keymap to the GPIO/LED count

rmi_f30_map_gpios() allocates gpioled_key_map with min(gpioled_count, TRACKSTICK_RANGE_END) == at most 6 entries, but rmi_f30_attention() iterates the full f30->gpioled_count (device query register, range 0..31) and dereferences gpioled_key_map[i], and input->keycodemax is set to the full gpioled_count while input->keycode points at the 6-entry allocation.

A device that reports gpioled_count > 6 with GPIO support enabled therefore causes an out-of-bounds read on the attention interrupt and out-of-bounds read/write through the EVIOCGKEYCODE/EVIOCSKEYCODE ioctls, which bound the index only against keycodemax. This is the same defect as the F3A handler, which was copied from F30.

Size the keymap for the full gpioled_count; the mapping loop still assigns only the first min(gpioled_count, TRACKSTICK_RANGE_END) entries.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-64276"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-25T10:17:08Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nInput: synaptics-rmi4 - bound the F30 keymap to the GPIO/LED count\n\nrmi_f30_map_gpios() allocates gpioled_key_map with\nmin(gpioled_count, TRACKSTICK_RANGE_END) == at most 6 entries, but\nrmi_f30_attention() iterates the full f30-\u003egpioled_count (device query\nregister, range 0..31) and dereferences gpioled_key_map[i], and\ninput-\u003ekeycodemax is set to the full gpioled_count while input-\u003ekeycode\npoints at the 6-entry allocation.\n\nA device that reports gpioled_count \u003e 6 with GPIO support enabled\ntherefore causes an out-of-bounds read on the attention interrupt and\nout-of-bounds read/write through the EVIOCGKEYCODE/EVIOCSKEYCODE ioctls,\nwhich bound the index only against keycodemax. This is the same defect\nas the F3A handler, which was copied from F30.\n\nSize the keymap for the full gpioled_count; the mapping loop still\nassigns only the first min(gpioled_count, TRACKSTICK_RANGE_END) entries.",
  "id": "GHSA-7j4q-9mx8-7779",
  "modified": "2026-07-27T06:30:31Z",
  "published": "2026-07-25T12:31:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64276"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/26c895928d7118436a24f564587cb4aefc40cdd8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e3689c26854356f41fbaa1eafa382e58ac79e00"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8c6d18d61bb6fe0e6edf848413391c590552e8a9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bfe622efecd4ff0a792d0ecd1a8dce535a902f50"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d162a1ead7de404d8b41a093c83ed0db6487cded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d577e46785d45484b2ab7e7309c49b18764bf56c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e849c6f51e6877104c765da084e001ec37c8e119"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f0be9eba946e9200b43265e0a748d38bd0a56954"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…