ghsa-7hp3-frg2-6v54
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 04:57
Modified
2022-05-17 04:57
Details

Buffer overflow in the dane_query_tlsa function in the DANE library (libdane) in GnuTLS 3.1.x before 3.1.15 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a response with more than four DANE entries.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-4466"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2013-11-20T14:12:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in the dane_query_tlsa function in the DANE library (libdane) in GnuTLS 3.1.x before 3.1.15 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a response with more than four DANE entries.",
  "id": "GHSA-7hp3-frg2-6v54",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T04:57:49Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T04:57:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-4466"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/7049"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/7050"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.gnutls.org/security.html#GNUTLS-SA-2013-3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/10/25/2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.