ghsa-79xj-76v6-3wgv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-11-08 06:30
Modified
2024-11-18 21:30
Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/bnxt_re: Add a check for memory allocation
__alloc_pbl() can return error when memory allocation fails. Driver is not checking the status on one of the instances.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2024-50209", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2024-11-08T06:15:17Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA/bnxt_re: Add a check for memory allocation\n\n__alloc_pbl() can return error when memory allocation fails.\nDriver is not checking the status on one of the instances.", id: "GHSA-79xj-76v6-3wgv", modified: "2024-11-18T21:30:44Z", published: "2024-11-08T06:30:49Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50209", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/322a19baaaa25a1fe8ce9fceaed9409ad847844c", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/76dd679c3b148d23f72dcf6c3cde3d5f746b2c07", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ba9045887b435a4c5551245ae034b8791b4e4aaa", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c5c1ae73b7741fa3b58e6e001b407825bb971225", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c71957271f2e8133a6aa82001c2fa671d5008129", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dbe51dd516e6d4e655f31c8a1cbc050dde7ba97b", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.