ghsa-72mq-5g76-mmq5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:24
Modified
2022-05-02 03:24
Details
The AV engine before DAT 5600 in McAfee VirusScan, Total Protection, Internet Security, SecurityShield for Microsoft ISA Server, Security for Microsoft Sharepoint, Security for Email Servers, Email Gateway, and Active Virus Defense allows remote attackers to bypass virus detection via (1) an invalid Headflags field in a malformed RAR archive, (2) an invalid Packsize field in a malformed RAR archive, or (3) an invalid Filelength field in a malformed ZIP archive.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2009-1348" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2009-04-30T20:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The AV engine before DAT 5600 in McAfee VirusScan, Total Protection, Internet Security, SecurityShield for Microsoft ISA Server, Security for Microsoft Sharepoint, Security for Email Servers, Email Gateway, and Active Virus Defense allows remote attackers to bypass virus detection via (1) an invalid Headflags field in a malformed RAR archive, (2) an invalid Packsize field in a malformed RAR archive, or (3) an invalid Filelength field in a malformed ZIP archive.", "id": "GHSA-72mq-5g76-mmq5", "modified": "2022-05-02T03:24:12Z", "published": "2022-05-02T03:24:12Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-1348" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content\u0026id=SB10001\u0026actp=LIST_RECENT" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://blog.zoller.lu/2009/04/mcafee-multiple-bypassesevasions-ziprar.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34949" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503173/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34780" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.