ghsa-6fc4-87xv-rxjx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:02
Modified
2022-05-17 05:02
Details
channels/chan_sip.c in Asterisk Open Source 1.8.x before 1.8.13.1 and 10.x before 10.5.2, Asterisk Business Edition C.3.x before C.3.7.5, Certified Asterisk 1.8.11-certx before 1.8.11-cert4, and Asterisk Digiumphones 10.x.x-digiumphones before 10.5.2-digiumphones does not properly handle a provisional response to a SIP reINVITE request, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (RTP port exhaustion) via sessions that lack final responses.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-3863" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-07-09T10:20:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "channels/chan_sip.c in Asterisk Open Source 1.8.x before 1.8.13.1 and 10.x before 10.5.2, Asterisk Business Edition C.3.x before C.3.7.5, Certified Asterisk 1.8.11-certx before 1.8.11-cert4, and Asterisk Digiumphones 10.x.x-digiumphones before 10.5.2-digiumphones does not properly handle a provisional response to a SIP reINVITE request, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (RTP port exhaustion) via sessions that lack final responses.", "id": "GHSA-6fc4-87xv-rxjx", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:02:46Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:02:46Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-3863" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-19992" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2012-010.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50687" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50756" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2550" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/54327" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.