ghsa-6cpg-3w7f-j67q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:29
Modified
2023-11-01 19:43
Severity ?
Summary
Apache OpenMeetings RCE
Details

Apache OpenMeetings before 3.1.2 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via RMI deserialization attack.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.apache.openmeetings:openmeetings-parent"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.1.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-8736"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-502"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-07-28T20:42:22Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-10-12T18:29:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Apache OpenMeetings before 3.1.2 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via RMI deserialization attack.",
  "id": "GHSA-6cpg-3w7f-j67q",
  "modified": "2023-11-01T19:43:30Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T01:29:42Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-8736"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/apache/openmeetings"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20161109161647/http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94145"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20230518120850/https://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/tr47byaaopnemvne"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Apache OpenMeetings RCE"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.