ghsa-5xq8-86qp-x5q2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:28
Modified
2022-05-02 03:28
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in aiff_read_header in libsndfile 1.0.15 through 1.0.19, as used in Winamp 5.552 and possibly other media programs, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via an AIFF file with an invalid header value.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2009-1791" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2009-05-26T17:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in aiff_read_header in libsndfile 1.0.15 through 1.0.19, as used in Winamp 5.552 and possibly other media programs, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via an AIFF file with an invalid header value.", "id": "GHSA-5xq8-86qp-x5q2", "modified": "2022-05-02T03:28:39Z", "published": "2022-05-02T03:28:39Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-1791" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/50541" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35076" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35247" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35443" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200905-09.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1814" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:132" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mega-nerd.com/erikd/Blog/CodeHacking/libsndfile" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mega-nerd.com/libsndfile" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34978" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1324" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.