GHSA-5W94-Q2G4-PRCG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-30 18:15 – Updated: 2022-04-30 18:15
VLAI?
Details
gnuserv before 3.12, as shipped with XEmacs, does not properly check the specified length of an X Windows MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE cookie, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a buffer overflow, or brute force authentication by using a short cookie length.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2001-0191"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-120"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2001-05-03T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "gnuserv before 3.12, as shipped with XEmacs, does not properly check the specified length of an X Windows MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE cookie, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a buffer overflow, or brute force authentication by using a short cookie length.",
"id": "GHSA-5w94-q2g4-prcg",
"modified": "2022-04-30T18:15:35Z",
"published": "2022-04-30T18:15:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2001-0191"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/6056"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2001-02/0030.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/security/2001/MDKSA-2001-019.php3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2001-010.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2001-011.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…