GHSA-5W25-HXP5-H8C9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-06-21 17:12 – Updated: 2026-01-23 22:42
VLAI?
Summary
Duplicate Advisory: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Details

Duplicate Advisory

This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-7r96-8g3x-g36m. This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description

tEnvoy contains the PGP, NaCl, and PBKDF2 in node.js and the browser (hashing, random, encryption, decryption, signatures, conversions), used by TogaTech.org. In versions prior to 7.0.3, the verifyWithMessage method of tEnvoyNaClSigningKey always returns true for any signature that has a SHA-512 hash matching the SHA-512 hash of the message even if the signature was invalid. This issue is patched in version 7.0.3. As a workaround: In tenvoy.js under the verifyWithMessage method definition within the tEnvoyNaClSigningKey class, ensure that the return statement call to this.verify ends in .verified.

Severity ?
9.8 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "tenvoy"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "7.0.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2021-06-17T18:47:52Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-06-16T01:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "## Duplicate Advisory\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-7r96-8g3x-g36m. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n## Original Description\ntEnvoy contains the PGP, NaCl, and PBKDF2 in node.js and the browser (hashing, random, encryption, decryption, signatures, conversions), used by TogaTech.org. In versions prior to 7.0.3, the `verifyWithMessage` method of `tEnvoyNaClSigningKey` always returns `true` for any signature that has a SHA-512 hash matching the SHA-512 hash of the message even if the signature was invalid. This issue is patched in version 7.0.3. As a workaround: In `tenvoy.js` under the `verifyWithMessage` method definition within the `tEnvoyNaClSigningKey` class, ensure that the return statement call to `this.verify` ends in `.verified`.",
  "id": "GHSA-5w25-hxp5-h8c9",
  "modified": "2026-01-23T22:42:00Z",
  "published": "2021-06-21T17:12:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/TogaTech/tEnvoy/security/advisories/GHSA-7r96-8g3x-g36m"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-32685"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/TogaTech/tEnvoy/commit/a121b34a45e289d775c62e58841522891dee686b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/TogaTech/tEnvoy/releases/tag/v7.0.3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Duplicate Advisory: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
  "withdrawn": "2026-01-23T22:42:00Z"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.