ghsa-5jjc-6f35-8hmp
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:04
Modified
2022-05-13 01:04
Details

Integer overflow in the valid_user_field function in journal/journald-native.c in systemd allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a large journal data field, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-4391"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2013-10-28T22:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Integer overflow in the valid_user_field function in journal/journald-native.c in systemd allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a large journal data field, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.",
  "id": "GHSA-5jjc-6f35-8hmp",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:04:12Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:04:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-4391"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859051"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-34"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725357"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=505b6a61c22d5565e9308045c7b9bf79f7d0517e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2777"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/10/01/9"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.