GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-5F39-WJPQ-XRRJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-25 09:31 – Updated: 2026-07-07 18:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

futex/requeue: Prevent NULL pointer dereference in remove_waiter() on self-deadlock

When FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI requeues a non-top waiter that already owns the target PI futex, task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() returns -EDEADLK before setting waiter->task.

The subsequent remove_waiter() in rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() dereferences the NULL waiter->task, causing a kernel crash.

Add a self-deadlock check for non-top waiters before calling rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(), analogous to the top-waiter check in futex_lock_pi_atomic().

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53166"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-476"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-25T09:16:33Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfutex/requeue: Prevent NULL pointer dereference in remove_waiter() on self-deadlock\n\nWhen FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI requeues a non-top waiter that already owns the\ntarget PI futex, task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() returns -EDEADLK before setting\nwaiter-\u003etask.\n\nThe subsequent remove_waiter() in rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() dereferences\nthe NULL waiter-\u003etask, causing a kernel crash.\n\nAdd a self-deadlock check for non-top waiters before calling\nrt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(), analogous to the top-waiter check in\nfutex_lock_pi_atomic().",
  "id": "GHSA-5f39-wjpq-xrrj",
  "modified": "2026-07-07T18:30:28Z",
  "published": "2026-06-25T09:31:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53166"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/16f8e17184b31382076f84751db5ac51fc02733e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1f2f3f3eacd6653ab215c5d2ea70811148d433fc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/74e144274af39935b0f410c0ee4d2b91c3730414"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…