ghsa-52f2-92w4-mx97
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:18
Modified
2022-05-24 17:18
Severity ?
Details
An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor 4.1.0 through 4.3.0 where records in the answer section of a NXDOMAIN response lacking an SOA were not properly validated in SyncRes::processAnswer, allowing an attacker to bypass DNSSEC validation.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2020-12244" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20", "CWE-347" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2020-05-19T14:15:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor 4.1.0 through 4.3.0 where records in the answer section of a NXDOMAIN response lacking an SOA were not properly validated in SyncRes::processAnswer, allowing an attacker to bypass DNSSEC validation.", "id": "GHSA-52f2-92w4-mx97", "modified": "2022-05-24T17:18:07Z", "published": "2022-05-24T17:18:07Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-12244" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2020-02.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NMP72NJGKBWR5WEBXAWX5KSLQUDFTG6S" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PS4ZN5XGENYNFKX7QIIOUCQQHXE37GJF" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4691" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-05/msg00052.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/05/19/3" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.