ghsa-4x57-68g7-9v3f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 02:59
Modified
2022-04-29 02:59
Details
The pnm_get_chunk function in xine 0.99.2 and earlier, and other packages such as MPlayer that use the same code, does not properly verify that the chunk size is less than the PREAMBLE_SIZE, which causes a read operation with a negative length that leads to a buffer overflow via (1) RMF_TAG, (2) DATA_TAG, (3) PROP_TAG, (4) MDPR_TAG, and (5) CONT_TAG values, a different vulnerability than CVE-2004-1187.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2004-1188" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2005-01-10T05:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The pnm_get_chunk function in xine 0.99.2 and earlier, and other packages such as MPlayer that use the same code, does not properly verify that the chunk size is less than the PREAMBLE_SIZE, which causes a read operation with a negative length that leads to a buffer overflow via (1) RMF_TAG, (2) DATA_TAG, (3) PROP_TAG, (4) MDPR_TAG, and (5) CONT_TAG values, a different vulnerability than CVE-2004-1187.", "id": "GHSA-4x57-68g7-9v3f", "modified": "2022-04-29T02:59:07Z", "published": "2022-04-29T02:59:07Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-1188" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/18638" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/xine/xine-lib/src/input/pnm.c?r1=1.20\u0026r2=1.21" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=177\u0026type=vulnerabilities" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2005:011" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mplayerhq.hu/MPlayer/patches/pnm_fix_20041215.diff" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.