ghsa-4vgm-f9qh-9vm8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 06:56
Modified
2022-05-01 06:56
Details
Buffer overflow in CGI scripts in Nagios 1.x before 1.4 and 2.x before 2.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a negative content length (Content-Length) HTTP header.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2006-2162" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2006-05-03T21:02:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in CGI scripts in Nagios 1.x before 1.4 and 2.x before 2.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a negative content length (Content-Length) HTTP header.", "id": "GHSA-4vgm-f9qh-9vm8", "modified": "2022-05-01T06:56:29Z", "published": "2022-05-01T06:56:29Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-2162" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26253" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=10297806\u0026forum_id=7890" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/282-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19991" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19998" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20013" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20215" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20247" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1072" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200605-07.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.nagios.org/development/changelog.php" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2006_05_19.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17879" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1662" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.