ghsa-4v5x-9m47-cqr2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-12-09 21:31
Modified
2025-03-25 21:48
Severity ?
4.2 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Summary
Duplicate Advisory: WildFly Elytron OpenID Connect Client Extension authorization code injection attack
Details

Duplicate Advisory

This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-5565-3c98-g6jc. This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description

A vulnerability was found in OIDC-Client. When using the RH SSO OIDC adapter with EAP 7.x or when using the elytron-oidc-client subsystem with EAP 8.x, authorization code injection attacks can occur, allowing an attacker to inject a stolen authorization code into the attacker's own session with the client with a victim's identity. This is usually done with a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) or phishing attack.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [
      {
         package: {
            ecosystem: "Maven",
            name: "org.wildfly:wildfly-elytron-oidc-client-subsystem",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "0",
                  },
                  {
                     last_affected: "34.0.1.Final",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   aliases: [],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-345",
      ],
      github_reviewed: true,
      github_reviewed_at: "2024-12-10T19:06:02Z",
      nvd_published_at: "2024-12-09T21:15:08Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "# Duplicate Advisory\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of [GHSA-5565-3c98-g6jc](https://advisory-inbox.githubapp.com/advisory_reviews/GHSA-5565-3c98-g6jc). This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n# Original Description\nA vulnerability was found in OIDC-Client. When using the RH SSO OIDC adapter with EAP 7.x or when using the elytron-oidc-client subsystem with EAP 8.x, authorization code injection attacks can occur, allowing an attacker to inject a stolen authorization code into the attacker's own session with the client with a victim's identity. This is usually done with a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) or phishing attack.",
   id: "GHSA-4v5x-9m47-cqr2",
   modified: "2025-03-25T21:48:41Z",
   published: "2024-12-09T21:31:02Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12369",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-12369",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331178",
      },
      {
         type: "PACKAGE",
         url: "https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
   summary: "Duplicate Advisory: WildFly Elytron OpenID Connect Client Extension authorization code injection attack",
   withdrawn: "2025-03-25T21:48:41Z",
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.