ghsa-4q5v-2rw8-85rj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-10-21 21:30
Modified
2024-10-24 06:30
Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: cfg80211: fix buffer overflow in elem comparison
For vendor elements, the code here assumes that 5 octets are present without checking. Since the element itself is already checked to fit, we only need to check the length.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2022-49023", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-120", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2024-10-21T20:15:13Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: cfg80211: fix buffer overflow in elem comparison\n\nFor vendor elements, the code here assumes that 5 octets\nare present without checking. Since the element itself is\nalready checked to fit, we only need to check the length.", id: "GHSA-4q5v-2rw8-85rj", modified: "2024-10-24T06:30:29Z", published: "2024-10-21T21:30:52Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49023", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/391cb872553627bdcf236c03ee7d5adb275e37e1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88a6fe3707888bd1893e9741157a7035c4159ab6", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9e6b79a3cd17620d467311b30d56f2648f6880aa", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9f16b5c82a025cd4c864737409234ddc44fb166a", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f5c2ec288a865dbe3706b09bed12302e9f6d696b", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.