GHSA-4M75-5382-C595

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-09-04 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netpoll: fix a use-after-free on shutdown path

There is a use-after-free error on netpoll, which is clearly detected by KASAN.

  BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80
  Read of size 1 at addr ... by task kworker/9:1
  Workqueue: events queue_process
  Call Trace:
   skb_dequeue+0x1e/0xb0
   queue_process+0x2c/0x600
   process_scheduled_works+0x4b6/0x850
   worker_thread+0x414/0x5a0
  Allocated by task 242:
   __netpoll_setup+0x201/0x4a0
   netpoll_setup+0x249/0x550
   enabled_store+0x32f/0x380
  Freed by task 0:
   kfree+0x1b7/0x540
   rcu_core+0x3f8/0x7a0

The problem happens when there is a pending TX worker running in parallel with the cleanup path.

This is what happens on netpoll shutdown path:

1) __netpoll_cleanup() is called 2) set dev->npinfo to NULL 3) call_rcu() with rcu_cleanup_netpoll_info() 3.1) rcu_cleanup_netpoll_info() tries to cancel all workers with cancel_delayed_work(), but doesn't wait for the worker to finish 4) and kfree(npinfo);

Because 3.1) doesn't really cancel the work, as the comment says "we can't call cancel_delayed_work_sync here, as we are in softirq", the TX worker can run after 4).

Tl;DR: queue_process() is not an RCU reader, it reaches npinfo through the work item via container_of().

Use disable_delayed_work_sync() to ensure the worker is completely stopped and prevent any future re-arming attempts. Once npinfo is set to NULL, senders will bail out and not queue new work. The disable flag ensures any in-flight re-arming attempts also fail silently.

In the future, we can do the cleanup inline here without needing the npinfo->rcu rcu_head, but that is net-next material.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-64424"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-416"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-25T10:17:26Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetpoll: fix a use-after-free on shutdown path\n\nThere is a use-after-free error on netpoll, which is clearly detected by\nKASAN.\n\n      BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80\n      Read of size 1 at addr ... by task kworker/9:1\n      Workqueue: events queue_process\n      Call Trace:\n       skb_dequeue+0x1e/0xb0\n       queue_process+0x2c/0x600\n       process_scheduled_works+0x4b6/0x850\n       worker_thread+0x414/0x5a0\n      Allocated by task 242:\n       __netpoll_setup+0x201/0x4a0\n       netpoll_setup+0x249/0x550\n       enabled_store+0x32f/0x380\n      Freed by task 0:\n       kfree+0x1b7/0x540\n       rcu_core+0x3f8/0x7a0\n\nThe problem happens when there is a pending TX worker running in\nparallel with the cleanup path.\n\nThis is what happens on netpoll shutdown path:\n\n1) __netpoll_cleanup() is called\n2) set dev-\u003enpinfo to NULL\n3) call_rcu() with rcu_cleanup_netpoll_info()\n  3.1) rcu_cleanup_netpoll_info() tries to cancel all workers with\n       cancel_delayed_work(), but doesn\u0027t wait for the worker to finish\n4) and kfree(npinfo);\n\nBecause 3.1) doesn\u0027t really cancel the work, as the comment says \"we\ncan\u0027t call cancel_delayed_work_sync here, as we are in softirq\", the TX\nworker can run after 4).\n\nTl;DR: queue_process() is not an RCU reader, it reaches npinfo through\nthe work item via container_of().\n\nUse disable_delayed_work_sync() to ensure the worker is completely\nstopped and prevent any future re-arming attempts. Once npinfo is set\nto NULL, senders will bail out and not queue new work. The disable flag\nensures any in-flight re-arming attempts also fail silently.\n\nIn the future, we can do the cleanup inline here without needing the\nnpinfo-\u003ercu rcu_head, but that is net-next material.",
  "id": "GHSA-4m75-5382-c595",
  "modified": "2026-09-04T18:31:12Z",
  "published": "2026-07-25T12:31:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64424"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/45f1458a85017a023f138b22ac5c76abd477db42"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5ed09a108d93a3b002cc79823d9455b50c4a8be7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/95ecc5b58042f6b6743b589e6588f1cd7ba336aa"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a33f37f8d079da7236ed7b7e2aed2a34ab81e7cf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…