GHSA-4G8V-7HMF-PF24

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-07-25 12:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

PCI/IOV: Skip VF Resizable BAR restore on read error

sriov_restore_vf_rebar_state() uses the VF Resizable BAR Control register to decide how many VF BARs to restore (nbars) and which VF BAR each iteration addresses (bar_idx). bar_idx indexes into dev->sriov->barsz[], which has only PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS (6) entries.

When a device does not respond, config reads typically return PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE (~0). Both fields are 3 bits wide, so nbars and bar_idx both evaluate to 7. The barsz[] access then goes out of bounds. UBSAN reports this as:

UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/pci/iov.c:948:51 index 7 is out of range for type 'resource_size_t [6]'

Observed on an NVIDIA RTX PRO 1000 GPU (GB207GLM) that stopped responding during a failed GC6 power state exit. The subsequent pci_restore_state() invoked sriov_restore_vf_rebar_state() while config reads returned 0xffffffff, triggering the splat.

Bail out if any VF Resizable BAR Control read returns PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE. No further VF BARs are touched, which is safe because a config read that returns PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE indicates the device is unreachable and restoration is pointless. This mirrors the guard in pci_restore_rebar_state().

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-64460"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-25T10:17:31Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI/IOV: Skip VF Resizable BAR restore on read error\n\nsriov_restore_vf_rebar_state() uses the VF Resizable BAR Control register\nto decide how many VF BARs to restore (nbars) and which VF BAR each\niteration addresses (bar_idx). bar_idx indexes into dev-\u003esriov-\u003ebarsz[],\nwhich has only PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS (6) entries.\n\nWhen a device does not respond, config reads typically return\nPCI_ERROR_RESPONSE (~0).  Both fields are 3 bits wide, so nbars and bar_idx\nboth evaluate to 7. The barsz[] access then goes out of bounds.  UBSAN\nreports this as:\n\n  UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/pci/iov.c:948:51 index 7 is out of range for type \u0027resource_size_t [6]\u0027\n\nObserved on an NVIDIA RTX PRO 1000 GPU (GB207GLM) that stopped responding\nduring a failed GC6 power state exit. The subsequent pci_restore_state()\ninvoked sriov_restore_vf_rebar_state() while config reads returned\n0xffffffff, triggering the splat.\n\nBail out if any VF Resizable BAR Control read returns PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE.\nNo further VF BARs are touched, which is safe because a config read that\nreturns PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE indicates the device is unreachable and\nrestoration is pointless. This mirrors the guard in\npci_restore_rebar_state().",
  "id": "GHSA-4g8v-7hmf-pf24",
  "modified": "2026-07-25T12:31:36Z",
  "published": "2026-07-25T12:31:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64460"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55fd485e66d0ad5c762c23dba1461fe9c741cd96"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b77524621250407386f44c6eea7e5e4619ada1ce"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f34f1712229d71ce4286440fef12526fd4590b37"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…