ghsa-4fqj-ghw2-3jmf
Vulnerability from github
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pstore: ram_core: fix possible overflow in persistent_ram_init_ecc()
In persistent_ram_init_ecc(), on 64-bit arches DIV_ROUND_UP() will return 64-bit value since persistent_ram_zone::buffer_size has type size_t which is derived from the 64-bit unsigned long, while the ecc_blocks variable this value gets assigned to has (always 32-bit) int type. Even if that value fits into int type, an overflow is still possible when calculating the size_t typed ecc_total variable further below since there's no cast to any 64-bit type before multiplication. Declaring the ecc_blocks variable as size_t should fix this mess...
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the SVACE static analysis tool.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2023-52685", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2024-05-17T15:15:19Z", severity: null, }, details: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\npstore: ram_core: fix possible overflow in persistent_ram_init_ecc()\n\nIn persistent_ram_init_ecc(), on 64-bit arches DIV_ROUND_UP() will return\n64-bit value since persistent_ram_zone::buffer_size has type size_t which\nis derived from the 64-bit *unsigned long*, while the ecc_blocks variable\nthis value gets assigned to has (always 32-bit) *int* type. Even if that\nvalue fits into *int* type, an overflow is still possible when calculating\nthe size_t typed ecc_total variable further below since there's no cast to\nany 64-bit type before multiplication. Declaring the ecc_blocks variable\nas *size_t* should fix this mess...\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the SVACE static\nanalysis tool.", id: "GHSA-4fqj-ghw2-3jmf", modified: "2024-05-17T15:31:11Z", published: "2024-05-17T15:31:11Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52685", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3b333cded94fbe5ce30d699b316c4715151268ae", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/48dcfc42ce705b652c0619cb99846afc43029de9", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/86222a8fc16ec517de8da2604d904c9df3a08e5d", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8fb12524c86bdd542a54857d5d076b1b6778c78c", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a34946ec3de88a16cc3a87fdab50aad06255a22b", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/acd413da3e1f37582207cd6078a41d57c9011918", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1fe1aede684bd014714dacfdc75586a9ad38657", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f9b891a7e8fcf83901f8507241e23e7420103b61", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.