ghsa-4fc4-p432-gw7h
Vulnerability from github
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: release nexthop on device removal
The CI is hitting some aperiodic hangup at device removal time in the pmtu.sh self-test:
unregister_netdevice: waiting for veth_A-R1 to become free. Usage count = 6 ref_tracker: veth_A-R1@ffff888013df15d8 has 1/5 users at dst_init+0x84/0x4a0 dst_alloc+0x97/0x150 ip6_dst_alloc+0x23/0x90 ip6_rt_pcpu_alloc+0x1e6/0x520 ip6_pol_route+0x56f/0x840 fib6_rule_lookup+0x334/0x630 ip6_route_output_flags+0x259/0x480 ip6_dst_lookup_tail.constprop.0+0x5c2/0x940 ip6_dst_lookup_flow+0x88/0x190 udp_tunnel6_dst_lookup+0x2a7/0x4c0 vxlan_xmit_one+0xbde/0x4a50 [vxlan] vxlan_xmit+0x9ad/0xf20 [vxlan] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x10e/0x360 __dev_queue_xmit+0xf95/0x18c0 arp_solicit+0x4a2/0xe00 neigh_probe+0xaa/0xf0
While the first suspect is the dst_cache, explicitly tracking the dst owing the last device reference via probes proved such dst is held by the nexthop in the originating fib6_info.
Similar to commit f5b51fe804ec ("ipv6: route: purge exception on removal"), we need to explicitly release the originating fib info when disconnecting a to-be-removed device from a live ipv6 dst: move the fib6_info cleanup into ip6_dst_ifdown().
Tested running:
./pmtu.sh cleanup_ipv6_exception
in a tight loop for more than 400 iterations with no spat, running an unpatched kernel I observed a splat every ~10 iterations.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-56751"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-29T12:15:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipv6: release nexthop on device removal\n\nThe CI is hitting some aperiodic hangup at device removal time in the\npmtu.sh self-test:\n\nunregister_netdevice: waiting for veth_A-R1 to become free. Usage count = 6\nref_tracker: veth_A-R1@ffff888013df15d8 has 1/5 users at\n\tdst_init+0x84/0x4a0\n\tdst_alloc+0x97/0x150\n\tip6_dst_alloc+0x23/0x90\n\tip6_rt_pcpu_alloc+0x1e6/0x520\n\tip6_pol_route+0x56f/0x840\n\tfib6_rule_lookup+0x334/0x630\n\tip6_route_output_flags+0x259/0x480\n\tip6_dst_lookup_tail.constprop.0+0x5c2/0x940\n\tip6_dst_lookup_flow+0x88/0x190\n\tudp_tunnel6_dst_lookup+0x2a7/0x4c0\n\tvxlan_xmit_one+0xbde/0x4a50 [vxlan]\n\tvxlan_xmit+0x9ad/0xf20 [vxlan]\n\tdev_hard_start_xmit+0x10e/0x360\n\t__dev_queue_xmit+0xf95/0x18c0\n\tarp_solicit+0x4a2/0xe00\n\tneigh_probe+0xaa/0xf0\n\nWhile the first suspect is the dst_cache, explicitly tracking the dst\nowing the last device reference via probes proved such dst is held by\nthe nexthop in the originating fib6_info.\n\nSimilar to commit f5b51fe804ec (\"ipv6: route: purge exception on\nremoval\"), we need to explicitly release the originating fib info when\ndisconnecting a to-be-removed device from a live ipv6 dst: move the\nfib6_info cleanup into ip6_dst_ifdown().\n\nTested running:\n\n./pmtu.sh cleanup_ipv6_exception\n\nin a tight loop for more than 400 iterations with no spat, running an\nunpatched kernel I observed a splat every ~10 iterations.",
"id": "GHSA-4fc4-p432-gw7h",
"modified": "2025-01-06T18:31:01Z",
"published": "2024-12-29T12:30:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56751"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0e4c6faaef8a24b762a24ffb767280e263ef8e10"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/43e25adc80269f917d2a195f0d59f74cdd182955"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a3c3f8a4d025acc8c857246ec2b812c59102487a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b2f26a27ea3f72f75d18330f76f5d1007c791848"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb02688c5c45c3e7af7e71f036a7144f5639cbfe"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.