ghsa-4f5r-74rh-r693
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:18
Modified
2022-04-30 18:18
Details

Buffer overflow in AOL Instant Messenger (AIM) 4.7.2480, 4.8.2616, and other versions allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long argument in a game request (AddGame).

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2002-0005"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2002-01-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in AOL Instant Messenger (AIM) 4.7.2480, 4.8.2616, and other versions allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long argument in a game request (AddGame).",
  "id": "GHSA-4f5r-74rh-r693",
  "modified": "2022-04-30T18:18:21Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T18:18:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-0005"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/7743"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=ntbugtraq\u0026m=100998295512885\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/907819"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ntbugtraq.com/default.asp?pid=36\u0026sid=1\u0026A2=ind0201\u0026L=ntbugtraq\u0026F=P\u0026S=\u0026P=198"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ntbugtraq.com/default.asp?pid=36\u0026sid=1\u0026A2=ind0201\u0026L=ntbugtraq\u0026F=P\u0026S=\u0026P=72"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/247944"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3769"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.