ghsa-4cqc-25m3-f64g
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:49
Modified
2022-05-13 01:49
Severity ?
Details
An issue was discovered in arm_pt in cplus-dem.c in GNU libiberty, as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.30. Stack Exhaustion occurs in the C++ demangling functions provided by libiberty, and there are recursive stack frames: demangle_arm_hp_template, demangle_class_name, demangle_fund_type, do_type, do_arg, demangle_args, and demangle_nested_args. This can occur during execution of nm-new.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2018-12641", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-400", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2018-06-22T12:29:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "An issue was discovered in arm_pt in cplus-dem.c in GNU libiberty, as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.30. Stack Exhaustion occurs in the C++ demangling functions provided by libiberty, and there are recursive stack frames: demangle_arm_hp_template, demangle_class_name, demangle_fund_type, do_type, do_arg, demangle_args, and demangle_nested_args. This can occur during execution of nm-new.", id: "GHSA-4cqc-25m3-f64g", modified: "2022-05-13T01:49:37Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:49:37Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-12641", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2075", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1763099", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85452", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201908-01", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23058", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4326-1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4336-1", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.