GHSA-4CPW-52R2-X798

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:12 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:57
VLAI
Details

Integer underflow in the asfrtp_parse_packet function in libavformat/rtpdec_asf.c in FFmpeg before 0.8.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted ASF packet.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-4031"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-191"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-05-09T10:33:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Integer underflow in the asfrtp_parse_packet function in libavformat/rtpdec_asf.c in FFmpeg before 0.8.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted ASF packet.",
  "id": "GHSA-4cpw-52r2-x798",
  "modified": "2025-04-11T03:57:30Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:12:18Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-4031"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=c2a2ad133eb9d42361804a568dee336992349a5e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git%3Ba=shortlog%3Bh=n0.8.3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=commit;h=c2a2ad133eb9d42361804a568dee336992349a5e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=shortlog;h=n0.8.3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/msvr/msvr11-012"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…