ghsa-49q9-mmpr-r526
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 16:51
Modified
2022-05-24 16:51
Details

An issue was discovered in OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.4.48. When using SASL authentication and session encryption, and relying on the SASL security layers in slapd access controls, it is possible to obtain access that would otherwise be denied via a simple bind for any identity covered in those ACLs. After the first SASL bind is completed, the sasl_ssf value is retained for all new non-SASL connections. Depending on the ACL configuration, this can affect different types of operations (searches, modifications, etc.). In other words, a successful authorization step completed by one user affects the authorization requirement for a different user.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2019-13565",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2019-07-26T13:15:00Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "An issue was discovered in OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.4.48. When using SASL authentication and session encryption, and relying on the SASL security layers in slapd access controls, it is possible to obtain access that would otherwise be denied via a simple bind for any identity covered in those ACLs. After the first SASL bind is completed, the sasl_ssf value is retained for all new non-SASL connections. Depending on the ACL configuration, this can affect different types of operations (searches, modifications, etc.). In other words, a successful authorization step completed by one user affects the authorization requirement for a different user.",
   id: "GHSA-49q9-mmpr-r526",
   modified: "2022-05-24T16:51:30Z",
   published: "2022-05-24T16:51:30Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-13565",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1b103833cb5bc8466e24ff0ecc5e75b45a705334ab6a444e64e840a0@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/08/msg00024.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/23",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://support.apple.com/kb/HT210788",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K98008862?utm_source=f5support&utm_medium=RSS",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4078-1",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4078-2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/?findid=9052",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-announce/201907/msg00001.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00053.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00058.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Dec/26",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.