GHSA-48RX-C7PG-Q66R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-10 20:37 – Updated: 2026-07-21 18:11
VLAI
Summary
Excon does not redact additional sensitive/risky headers when following redirects
Details

Impact

The redirect follower middleware previously failed to strip a number of headers that are known to be sensitive and did not provide a way to provide a custom list of headers to strip.

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted? This could cause inadvertent leakage of sensitive data for users of the RedirectFollower middleware in cases where the initial request includes header information that is not intended for the new target.

Patches

Patch exists and is released in v1.5.0

Workarounds

Users can backport the fix to a custom redirect follower middleware.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
        "name": "excon"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.5.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-54171"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-201",
      "CWE-200",
      "CWE-522"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-10T20:37:29Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-17T20:17:26Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nThe redirect follower middleware previously failed to strip a number of headers that are known to be sensitive and did not provide a way to provide a custom list of headers to strip. \n\n_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_\nThis could cause inadvertent leakage of sensitive data for users of the RedirectFollower middleware in cases where the initial request includes header information that is not intended for the new target.\n\n### Patches\nPatch exists and is released in v1.5.0\n\n### Workarounds\nUsers can backport the [fix](https://github.com/excon/excon/commit/ea89a35308a12f4b791b6c50f2cbd33f94889fa3) to a custom redirect follower middleware.",
  "id": "GHSA-48rx-c7pg-q66r",
  "modified": "2026-07-21T18:11:28Z",
  "published": "2026-07-10T20:37:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/excon/excon/security/advisories/GHSA-48rx-c7pg-q66r"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54171"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/excon/excon/pull/901"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/excon/excon/commit/ea89a35308a12f4b791b6c50f2cbd33f94889fa3"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/excon/excon"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/excon/CVE-2026-54171.yml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54171"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Excon does not redact additional sensitive/risky headers when following redirects"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…