ghsa-3rjp-6929-2mrw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 07:07
Modified
2022-05-01 07:07
Details

HTTP server in Cisco Wireless Control System (WCS) for Linux and Windows before 3.2(51) stores sensitive information under the web root with insufficient access control, which allows remote attackers to obtain usernames and directory paths via a direct URL request.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-3290"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-06-28T23:05:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "HTTP server in Cisco Wireless Control System (WCS) for Linux and Windows before 3.2(51) stores sensitive information under the web root with insufficient access control, which allows remote attackers to obtain usernames and directory paths via a direct URL request.",
  "id": "GHSA-3rjp-6929-2mrw",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T07:07:36Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T07:07:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-3290"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/27442"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20870"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016398"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20060628-wcs.shtml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/26879"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18701"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2583"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.