ghsa-389w-w95c-w2gj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:18
Modified
2022-04-30 18:18
Details

SMTP proxy in Symantec Enterprise Firewall (SEF) 6.5.x includes the firewall's physical interface name and address in an SMTP protocol exchange when NAT translation is made to an address other than the firewall, which could allow remote attackers to determine certain firewall configuration information.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2002-0309"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2002-05-31T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "SMTP proxy in Symantec Enterprise Firewall (SEF) 6.5.x includes the firewall\u0027s physical interface name and address in an SMTP protocol exchange when NAT translation is made to an address other than the firewall, which could allow remote attackers to determine certain firewall configuration information.",
  "id": "GHSA-389w-w95c-w2gj",
  "modified": "2022-04-30T18:18:58Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T18:18:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-0309"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=101424307617060\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=101430810813853\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/security/Content/2002.02.20.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/8251.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/4141"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.